Theory and History of Ontology (www.ontology.co)by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: rc@ontology.co

Selected bibliography on the Theory of Categories of Charles S. Peirce

Contents of this Section

This part of the section Ontologists of 19th and 20th centuries includes the following pages:

Peirce's Theory of Categories (under construction)

Selected bibliography of Peirce's Theory of Categories (Current page)

Bibliography

  1. Aronson, Jerrold L. 1969. "Connections: A Defense of Peirce's Category of Thirdness." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 5:158-172.

  2. Atkin, Albert. 2016. Peirce. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter Six: Metaphysics, "The categories", pp. 226-241.

  3. Atkins, Richard Kenneth. 2006. "Restructuring the Sciences: Peirce's Categories and His Classifications of the Sciences." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 42:483-500.

  4. ———. 2010. "An “Entirely Different Set of Categories”: Peirce's Material Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 46:94-110.

  5. ———. 2012. "A Guess at the Other Riddle: The Peircean Material Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 48:530-557.

  6. ———. 2018. Charles S. Peirce's Phenomenology: Analysis and Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Contents: Acknowledgments IX; Introduction 1; 1. The Kantian Insight 8; 2. The Place of “On a New List of Categories” 28; 3. Peirce’s Reduction Thesis 57; 4. From Phenomenology to Phaneroscopy 73; 5. Phenomenological Investigation 106; 6. The Phenomenological Categories 140; 7. How Seeing a Scarlet Red Is Like Hearing a Trumpet’s Blare 205; Notes 229; Bibliography 239; Index 249.

  7. Atkins, Rchard Kenneth. 2024. "Peirce's Formal and Material Categories in Phenomenology." In The Oxford Handbook to Charles S. Peirce, edited by de Waal, Cornelis, 61-76. New York: Oxford University Press.

    "Conclusion.

    Peirce explores two different hypotheses with respect to classifying the phaneron’s constituents. The first is that they may be classified according to the three basic predicate forms of firstness, secondness, and thirdness. This is the formal classification and the one to which Peirce devotes the most energy. The second is that the phaneron’s constituents may be classified on a continuum between positiveness and negativeness.

    There are only hints throughout Peirce’s manuscripts as to how such a classification is to work. Nonetheless, Peirce evidently holds that the formal and material categories can be combined to construct a sort of “phanerochemical” table of constituents.

    Much as the chemical elements are classified by their periodicity and atomic weight, a phanerochemical table of constituents would have (I) as its columns (A) firstness, secondness, and thirdness, including these in (B) their logical ingredient relations (the firstness of secondness, the secondness of thirdness, etc.) and (C) their degenerate and genuine forms and (II) as its rows degrees of intensity between positiveness and negativeness.

    Yet it must be admitted that Peirce’s project remains largely unfinished and its prospects remain uncertain." (p. 74)

  8. Blachowicz, James A. 1972. "Realism and Idealism in Peirce's Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 8:199-213.

  9. Buzzelli, Donald E. 1972. "The Argument of Peirce's "New List of Categories"." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 8:63-89.

  10. Colapietro, Vincent M. 2001. "A lantern for the feet of inquirers: The heuristic function of the Peircean categories." Semiotica no. 136:201-216.

  11. ———. 2008. "Peirce categories and sign studies." In Approaches to Communication: Trends in Global Communication Studies, edited by Petrilli, Susan, 35-50. Madison: Atwood Publishing.

    Abstract: "Charles Peirce’s theory of signs greatly depends on his doctrine of categories, since this doctrine informs or inspires virtually all of his classifications of signs (e.g., that of iconical, indexical, and symbolic signs). Thus, an adequate understanding of Peirce’s semiotic or (as he most often spelled it) semeiotic is impossible apart from at least a working knowledge of the Peircean categories. This essay offers a primer of Peirce’s categories of firstness, secondness, and thirdness. Here the author succinctly explains the articulation, definition, number, names, functions, applications, origin, status, derivation, and justification of these categories. Such explanations throw much light on the theoretical structure exhibited by, and the intricate classifications encountered in, Peirce’s minutely detailed theory of signs."

  12. ———. 3025. "C. S. Peirce’s Phenomenological Categories: Their Basic Form, Recursive Elaboration, and Heuristic Purpose." Journal Phänomenologie no. 44:10-20.

  13. De Tienne, André. 1988. "Peirce's Search for a Method of Finding the Categories." Versus. Quaderni di studi semiotici (VS) no. 49:19-30.

  14. ———. 1989. "Peirce's Early Method of Finding the Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 25:385-406.

  15. ———. 1996. L’analytique de la représentation chez Peirce : La genése de la théorie des categories. Brussels: Facultés universitaires Sant- Louis.

  16. de Waal, Cornelis. 2013. Peirce: A Guide to the Perplexed. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Chapter 3: Phenomenology and the categories, pp. 33-46.

  17. Dea, Shannon. 2008. "Firstness, Evolution and the Absolute in Peirce's Spinoza." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 44:603-628.

  18. DeMarco, Joseph P. 1973. "Peirce's Categories and Normative Inquiry." Journal of Value Inquiry no. 7:214-216.

  19. Dilworth, David A. 2014. "Intellectual Gravity and Elective Attractions: The Provenance of Peirce's Categories in Friedrich von Schiller." Cognitio, São Paulo no. 15:37-72.

  20. Esposito, Joseph L. 1979. "The Development of Peirce's Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 15:51-60.

  21. ———. 1980. Evolutionary Metaphysics: The Development of Peirce's Theory of Categories. Athens: Ohio University Press.

  22. Fabbrichesi Leo, Rossella. 1994. "The Relevance of the Concept of Relation in Peirce." In Living Doubt: Essays concerning the epistemology 0f Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Debrock, Guy and Hulswit, Menno, 95-102. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  23. Feibleman, James K. 1946. An Introduction to Peirce's Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Foreword by Bertrand Russell.

    Second edition with a new Introduction pp. XVII-XX, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England, The M.I.T. Press, 1969.

    Chapter 4. Metaphysics: A. Phenomenology; 144; B. The Phenomenological Categories 156; C. Metaphysics 169; D. The Metaphysical Categories 183-195.

  24. Fidora, Alexander. 2007. "Peirce's Account of the Categories and Ramon Llull." Studia Lulliana no. 47:175-186.

  25. Forster, Paul. 2008. "What Grounds the Categories? Peirce and Santayana." Overheard in Seville: Bulletin of the Santayana Society no. 26:8-18.

  26. Fuhrman, Gary. 2013. "Peirce’s Retrospectives on his Phenomenological Quest." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 49:490-508.

  27. Gartenberg, Zachary Micah. 2012. "Intelligibility and Subjectivity in Peirce: A Reading of His “New List of Categories”." Journal of the History of Philosophy no. 50:581-610.

  28. Gorlée, Dinda L. 2009. "A sketch of Peirce’s Firstness and its significance to art." Sign Systems Studies no. 37:205-269.

  29. Greenlee, Douglas. 1968. "Peirce's Hypostatic and Factorial Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 4:49-58.

  30. Grillo, Eric. 2007. "Peirce on categories: Towards a metaphysical foundation of pragmatics." Semiotica no. 167:309-336.

  31. Guardiano, Nicholas Lee. 2015. "The Categorial Logic of Peirce’s Metaphysical Cosmogony." The Pluralist no. 10:313-334.

  32. Hartshorne, Charles. 1980. "A Revision of Peirce's Categories." The Monist no. 63:277-289.

  33. Hausman, Carl R. 1988. "Fourthness: Carl Vaught on Peirce's Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 24:265-278.

  34. ———. 1988. "Value and the Peircean Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 15:203-223.

  35. ———. 2008. "Charles Peirce’s Categories and the Growth of Reason." International Journal for the Semiotic of Law no. 21:209-222.

  36. Hilpinen, Risto. 1972. "On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 43:610-618.

  37. Hookway, Christopher. 1985. Peirce. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Part One. Peirce's project: the pursuit of truth; III. Categories, pp. 80-117.

  38. Houser, Nathan. 1990. "Peirce's Pre-Phenomenological Categories." In Semiotics, 1988, edited by Deely, John, Prewitt, Terry and Haworth, Karen, 103-108. Lanham: University Press of America.

  39. Ketner, Kenneth Laine. 1989. "Hartshorne and the Basis of Peirce's Categories." In Hartshorne: Process Philosophy and Theology, edited by Kane, Robert and Phillips, Stephen H., 135-149. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  40. Krausser, Peter. 1972. "The Three Fundamental Structural Categories of Charles S. Peirce." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 13:189-215.

  41. Kruse, Felicia. 1991. "Genuineness and Degeneracy in Peirce's Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 27:267-298.

  42. Lee, Harold N. 1980. "One, Two, Three: Peirce's Categories." The Southern Journal of Philosophy no. 18:433-445.

  43. Mertz, Donald W. 1979. "Peirce: Logic, Categories, and Triads." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 8:158-173.

  44. Michael, Frederick. 1980. "The Deduction of Categories in Peirce's "New List"." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 16:179-211.

  45. Michalska, Anna. 2019. "Between Phenomenology and Semantics: Charles S. Peirce’s Conception of Categories Revisited." Archiwum Historii Filozofii i Myśli Społecznej no. 64:113-128.

  46. Misak, Cheryl J. 2004. "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914)." In The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, edited by Misak, Cheryl J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    § 7: The categories, pp. 19-23.

  47. Mittelberg, Irene. 2019. "Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis." Semiotica no. 228:193-222.

  48. Murphey, Murray G. 1961. The Development of Peirce's Philosophy. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Reprinted by Hackett, 1993 with a new preface and a new appendix with footnotes keyed to the manuscript classifications by Max Fisch.

  49. ———. 1965. "On Peirce's Metaphysics." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 1:12-25.

  50. Nadin, Mihail. 1980. "The Logic of Vagueness and the Category of Synechism." The Monist no. 63:351-363.

  51. O'Dowd, Sarah. 1982. "Comparative Adjectives in Terms of Peirce’s Phenomenological Categories." In Semiotics 1980, edited by Herzfeld, Michael and Lenhart, Margot D., 355-364. New York: Plenum Press.

    Abstract: "This paper explores ways in which semiotic concepts of Charles Sanders Peirce illuminate the meaning-potential of English comparative adjectives. Having classified all phenomena into categories of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness, Peirce describes the three degrees of adjectives in terms of these categories: “Firstness is the mode of being of that which is such as it is, positively and without reference to anything else” (Hardwick, 1977: 24). The uncompared positive degree of an adjective such as red or hard, then, is Peirce’s example of Firstness. We return to this idea later."

  52. Oehler, Klaus. 1976. "Peirce contra Aristotle. Two Forms of the Theory of Categories." In Proceedings of the C. S. Peirce Bicentennial international Congress, edited by Ketner, Kenneth Laine, 335-342. Lubbock: Texas Tech Press.

  53. Ormiston, Gayle L. 1977. "Peirce's Categories: Structure of Semiotic." Semiotica no. 19:209-231.

  54. Pitt, Joseph C. 2005. "Hume and Peirce on Belief, or, Why Belief Should Not Be Considered an Epistemic Category." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 41:343-354.

  55. Powell, Ralph Austin. 1985. "Kant's Thought Interpreted Through Peirce's Categories." In Semiotics 1984, edited by Deely, John, 325-332. New York: University Press of America.

  56. Rosensohn, William L. 1974. The Phenomenology of Charles S. Peirce: From the Doctrine of Categories to Phaneroscopy. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.

    Contents: Part. I. The elements of Phenomenology. Foreword VII; I. The beginnings of Phenomenology - Introductory 1; II. The birth of Phenomenology (1867-1868) 19; III. The same subject concluded 53; Part II. IV: Phenomenology and Nature (1867-1904) 59; V. Phaneroscopy: the description of the phaneron 77; Appendix 103; Bibliography 105, Index 107-109.

    From the Foreword: "To trace the development of Peirce's phenomenology from a doctrine of Categories to the ground on which philosophy and science rest is the purpose of this book. Although parallels with Husserl's thought are inevitable, it has seemed proper to this writer to emphasize the growth of Peirce's own ideas and the scientific-philosophical background out of which they emerged. Thus Peirce's most original contributions, viz., a set of universal categories appearing in thought, nature and experience, the method of their discovery, and Phaneroscopy, the science that describes the phaneron, or the collective total of all that is in any way or in any sense present to the mind, are shown in the context of a single, evolving body of thought - a comprehensive philosophy shaped by Peirce's lifelong interest in logic, the sciences, ethics, aesthetics and metaphysics."

  57. Rosenthal, Sandra B. 1988. "Processive Emergence and the Peircean Categories." Versus. Quaderni di studi semiotici (VS) no. 49:121-127.

  58. ———. 1997. "Pragmatic Experimentalism and the Derivation of the Categories." In The Rule of Reason: The Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Brunning, Jacqueline and Forster, Paul, 120-138. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  59. Santaella-Braga, Lucia. 1995. "The universality and fecundity of Peirce’s categories." Semiotica no. 154:405-414.

  60. Savan, David. 1952. "On the Origins of Peirce's Phenomenology." In Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Wiener, Philip P. and Young, Frederic H., 185-194. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

  61. Short, Thomas L. 2013. "Questions Concerning Certain Claims Made for the ‘New List’." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 49:267-298.

  62. Staat, Wim. 1993. "On Abduction, Deduction, Induction and the Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 29:225-237.

  63. Stern, Robert. 2005. "Peirce on Hegel: Nominalist or Realist?" Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 41:65-99.

  64. ———. 2007. "Peirce, Hegel, and the Category of Firstness." Internationales Jahrbuch des deutschen Idealismus = International Yearbook of German Idealism no. 5:276-308.

  65. ———. 2007. "Peirce, Hegel, and the Category of Secondness." Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy no. 50:123-155.

  66. ———. 2013. "An Hegelian in Strange Costume? On Peirce’s Relation to Hegel I." Philosophy Compass no. 8:53-62.

  67. ———. 2013. "An Hegelian in Strange Costume? On Peirce’s Relation to Hegel II." Philosophy Compass no. 8:63-72.

  68. Sytko, Yurii L., and Kuzina, Olga A. 2019. "Interpretation of signs in the conception of Ch. S. Pierce via predicabilia and categories of Aristotle." SHS Web of Conferences no. 68:1-5.

    Abstract: "The article is devoted to the hypothesis explaining the order of signs’ classes presented in the manuscripts and articles of Ch.S. Pierce via the diagram of relations of Aristotle’s categories which was described in the first translation of Aristotle into Latin conducted after Boethius by Julius Pacius. The hypothesis allows explaining not only the order of categories in the Ch.S. Pierces diagram but also interpreting them via ten categories of Aristotle on the background of scholastic tradition of depicting relations. The conclusion is drawn that the theory of Ch.S. Pierce seems to be the development of Aristotle’s doctrine of categories. The article can contribute to the history of philosophy."

  69. Tillerr, Glenn. 2008. "Counting Categories with Peirce and Santayana." Overheard in Seville: Bulletin of the Santayana Society no. 26:1-7.

  70. Topa, Alessandro. 2017. "The reemergence of Schiller in Peirce’s reminiscences of the Æsthetic Letters: a critical addendum to D. Dilworth’s account of the provenance of Peirce’s categories in Schiller." Cognitio, São Paulo no. 18:326-343.

  71. ———. 2018. "The Categories in disguise: a categoriological specification of D. Dilworth’s account of the provenance of Peirce’s Categories in Schiller." Cognitio, São Paulo no. 19:160-178.

  72. Turrisi, Patricia A. 1990. "Peirce's Logic of Discovery: Abduction and the Universal Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 26:465-497.

  73. Tursman, Dick. 1988. "Analytical Mechanics and Peirce's Categories." Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society no. 24:223-238.